Tuesday, November 17, 2009
APA Documentation
In this passage it tries to help students like myself learn how to use apa documentation in a paper. There are many different types of citations and this passage gives you examples and how you can add them into a paper. APA can be put in footnotes, parenthetical citations that are in the text. They may include the authors name, page number that it is found on, and when it was published. This publication help me a lot to know how the appropriate way to cite in a sentence and just in a paper in general. These are things that I did not know before I read this. The examples that are given in this paper help a lot because not only does it explain the process word for word but it also shows you in a way that you can follow and easily put to use in your paper. It even gives examples for if there is more than one author. This is something that can occur frequently and that you would need to know how to cite this properly to completely finish the citation. For almost any kind of problem you may run into when citing is explained in great detail and an example is given. This answers almost any question that someone may have towards how they may do this properly. This was very useful and answered a lot of my questions that I had and helped me to do them properly when needed and it was something I have never done before.
How Campus Censors Squelch Freedom of Speech
In this book they use an expample of a white male that is trying to post a flyer on a buliten board showing that a writter is coming and the name of the publication. Some students found it offensive and treatened to call the campus security. So the man left but someone did call and he was reported to spreading racailly offensive materials. The campus police did get the man for disruption all because some people felt that it was not exceptable to have that title published on a paper. Was he wrong? All he did was try to publisize that a writter was coming to campus to discuse her writting. But all because of the title people sought out to make sure that he was punished. Some students argued that because the school gives the student body power to veto anything that is shown to the public that what happened to the man was exceptable and that no one was in the wrong. This school is not the only one that punishes students for speech that they disaprove of. Although the amount of students punished for speech that people may find offensive or inapropriate has dramaticly declined over the years it is still something that happens very often on the campus. However campus censorship is still alive and well and is often justified under the sexual harrasment rules. But if the censorship was kept completely in the hands of the student then chaos would break out. So in many ways it is best that there is some backbone to what students can write and publish. They help to lower the amount of people hurt by what is published on campus and that others can see. Some take it as far as expelling the student or pressing charges if the publication is bad enough to warent it.
Pornography, Obscenity, and the Case for Censorship
Many people fought against censorship but they got more than they bargained for. Yes they got many books published that may have been slightly offensive but with it they brought in the era of porn and other such publications. Many say that this is the exact opposite of what they wanted. They say that "what reason is there to think that anyone was ever corrupted by a book?" and that is true and what they were fighting for. All they wanted was the free publication of books that in the past have been said to be slightly offensive. But people took it to the extreme and have profited big from it. But at what cost? New York city has been corrupted by this new sale of profain magazines or movies. So instead of worrying about the books corrupting children and our youth now we have to worry about a whole new kind of smut or provacative publications. Some people feel that if you have never been corrupted by a book than you have never truely learned or experience controversal ideas. So isnt porn and other provacative publications art? Where is the line drawn not only between ideas but laws and how we plan to stop of limit who is exposed to these "adult" entertainment. Some feel that pornography tourtures or harms how a person experiences life, it can take away free spirit but does it? It is a persons choice to watch or read these items. They may argue that if this is aloud to pass as entertainment then so should the acts performed in the Roman Coloseum. But is a act of death and violence the same as this porn? One of the many facts is that no one is forced to watch these things and they still have their free will but it showing up in movies that their children watch is something that has been left up to the parents to help censor. THis may not stop children from watching said publications but in many ways it gets the parents involved in the kids lives. People will do anything to become famous and rich. I feel that although porn is a dirty and something that i do not need that it is not hurting anyone but is just another color in our country.
Television News: The Language of Pictures
Telivision and news sum up all of the events at hand in a short amount of time. In many cases they are call recreations and they come to us in language and pictures. They take a one page and turn it into a one hour show and they can do this by showing pictures. It is said that a picture is worth a thousand words by (Postman and powers pg 406) and in many ways this is true. A picture can sum up alot like feelings problems and pretty much anything you want. In many ways moving pictures are sort of like a language in themselves. Just a single picture can be limited to what it says but added with words it can tell a whole story. Adding music to the pictures can further add to the picture and the feeling that it is trying to convey. Photos can also represent a time or document it. Like it a ransom photo they show the person holding a newspaper or something else that may have a date or a photo from a particular day that can show the specific day and time. But a picture can also leave a lot out about what is going on. Like a picture of a car on a road but without signs. This picture may show a car or a family but not where the car is or if it is moving. But with the addition of smoke or moving rain u can tell if the car is moving or coming to a stop. With just these simple additions you can add a lot to a photo and help to tell the story better. This is why people perfer moving pictures because they can show not only one but many photos that can help to explain and tell the story better. They not only explain but they keep the viewer interested if it is something that many people may not find as something they would listen to. However if you add a few pictures or a short news real then people can watch and it helps to keep their attention a lot longer than if it was just someone talking for an hour. I agree with all of this. I can not watch the news most times because i am not interested in the topic but when photos or videos are used i find it easier and better to watch.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Selection, Slanting, and Charged Language
Slanting has always taken place in the written language. Weather it is written or spoken it is still the same concept and it is for the same reasons. Slanting is defined as the process of selecting knowledge- factual and attitudinal, words and, emphasis, to achieve the intention of the communicator. ( Birk pg 395) You can add emphasis but using italics. This will help to slant the viewer’s attention or you can stress a word in the sentence. Question marks comas exclamations and other punctuations can also add to slanting. It is impossible to put two facts together without giving some slant or emphasis. Slanting is not always about how you add a word or change the way it may look, it can also be just by simply not putting in facts that are against your argument or your topic. When writing a sentence a good way to slant is by using charged words. Charged words can be words that help to describe something further in depth or using good action words that give the reader a better feeling or idea about the passage. In spoken language you can help to show a slant by the way you raise or lower your voice. However not all of the time do you have to show a slant by words, hand motions and facial expressions can also add to the feeling and slant of the conversation. I use slanted language almost every time I talk and so do most people. It is just a way of speech that we all take part in.
Monday, October 19, 2009
What happens when people write?
I am one of those people who believe that if you do not have the gift of writing then you can never write anything good. Every once in a while I stumble upon the right words that seem to make a paper better than I would expect but I would just call that luck and nothing more. I agree that with practice anyone could learn how to write a good paper. Just like a sports player, as long as you have a little bit of skill then you can be taught the ins and outs of whatever you are trying. The principle that you cannot teach old dogs new tricks does not apply to the writing world. The only person that cannot be taught how to write is a stubborn person that does not truly want to learn the craft. In many cases people can actually write but they are to critical of their writing and they never give it a chance. The best way to learn to write Is to not have the “either you have it or you don’t” attitude (Hairston pg99). Having this attitude will only limit the potential of the writing and will ultimately end with a below standard paper. From reading this paper it has given me more confidence in my ability to write a good paper and that it is not just luck it can be a skill that i can perfect over time if i work at it.
Friday, October 16, 2009
Simplicity
I agree completely with everything the writer has to say. Many different times I find myself reading and rereading a sentence just because it is worded weird and I do not understand why it was said that way. I do not understand why people feel that sophisticated words are what make good writing good writing. I would chose a book that gives good detail in a way that I can understand the first time instead of reading a book that was more caught up in the words than it was in what it was trying to say. Writing is hard I feel mainly because it is frustrating. No one likes to fail once let alone hundreds of times just because they can’t seem to find that magical sentence that brings it all together. There is a lack of people reading now a day because for many people it is too much work trying to decipher what the author meant to say in his or her sentences. With all of the rules that the English language has you would think that people would want to simplify it as much as possible to create less work but it is just the opposite. Many writers feel that if they aren’t using big words than its like writing a children’s book. So they make it more difficult to read than it has to be in hopes for an older group of people to read it. But at any age who wants to read something that makes them feel inferior to the author? Who wants to work at reading a book when in many cases all they want to do is to relax? So in many respects I applaud this author and this writing because it brings a very important point up that I believe everyone can relate to.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Group Presentations
This senction of reading has in a way sort of helped me to better understand how we are supposed to set up out group presentation. For it to be a group presentation it not only has to be comprised of everyone talking but also that they show their ideas and share them with the group to make our presentation better. When we get into our groups we need to discus everything thoroughly and compile our ideas into a well thought out and flowing presentation. A well thought out presentation does not have any noticeable breaks even when the speakers change. The best was to introduce a new speaker is in the sentence, and not to just jump out there and say there name. This will help to create a better flow and make it less noticeable to the listener that the subject of person has changed. When practicing our presentations we need to break up the time we use because the listener can tell the imbalances in between speakers. Giving one person a minute will draw attention to how unprepared that person is and how they were just given a small part to get some credit. This can make a presentation sloppy and less successful than it could be. All of these things are very important for my group and I to consider and to base how we form our paper or even think about it. With the help of this section we had to read I hope that it will make my part of the presentation better and have it flow with the rest of the information that my group will compile.
Monday, October 12, 2009
Urban
Urban
For my urban setting I went to the Pirmani’s on Forbes Avenue. I arrived and was seated around seven o’clock. During my one hour stay at this restaurant there was a Penguins hockey game on that could have affected people’s moods or their reason for visiting this specific restaurant.
This specific Pirmani’s brother was located near the University of Pittsburgh and was rather small in size. Upon entering the first thing you saw was a bar style place to eat and a television. I was then instructed to seat myself and that my waitress would be right with me. There were only two tables taken and most of the patrons sat at the bar watching the game. The waitress that waited on my table was rather rude and in a hurry mainly because she was one of the two only people working that night. Once taking my food and drink order she hurried away and was back with my drink quickly which she put on the table with some force and did not seem to be happy that I was there. For the rest of the night she stayed away from my table except when it was absolutely necessary to check on my progress. She seemed stressed and like she did not enjoy here job and would rather be anywhere else than at work.
Most of the people that were eating at this place were either college kids or they looked like they were just out of high school. They seemed to stay to themselves and avoid sitting in the center of the room. Many of the groups of kids sat either at the bar watching the game or in a corner away from everyone else. When they were asked a question by the waitress they were polite but then quickly went back to their laughter and conversations. Every one sat in a group of four or more and they all seemed to be close friends.
Upon different times during the night people either hurried or staggered in looking for a sandwich. In many cases they stood by the bar waiting patiently for their food to be done. When it was completed the paid and hurried out the door and to their next destination. The people who just walked in kept to themselves and avoided eye contact or conversation with anyone else in the building.
The people at the bar seemed only interesting in the game and the people they were with. Most of them were under the drinking age so they just sat eating their food and sipping on their pops. Everyone seemed to have their own agenda and was there primarily there only to eat. The only time they talked was when they were asked questions either by their friends or the disgruntled waitress.
All in all it wasn’t a very family oriented restaurant instead it was based all around the food and any kind of sporting games that were on at the time. The people were nice only when they had to be and other times they just seemed to ignore that other people were even in the room. Almost everyone seemed like they were in a hurry and this was just a quick snack before they moved on to their next destination. The longest any one table stayed was a maximum of forty five minutes.
For my urban setting I went to the Pirmani’s on Forbes Avenue. I arrived and was seated around seven o’clock. During my one hour stay at this restaurant there was a Penguins hockey game on that could have affected people’s moods or their reason for visiting this specific restaurant.
This specific Pirmani’s brother was located near the University of Pittsburgh and was rather small in size. Upon entering the first thing you saw was a bar style place to eat and a television. I was then instructed to seat myself and that my waitress would be right with me. There were only two tables taken and most of the patrons sat at the bar watching the game. The waitress that waited on my table was rather rude and in a hurry mainly because she was one of the two only people working that night. Once taking my food and drink order she hurried away and was back with my drink quickly which she put on the table with some force and did not seem to be happy that I was there. For the rest of the night she stayed away from my table except when it was absolutely necessary to check on my progress. She seemed stressed and like she did not enjoy here job and would rather be anywhere else than at work.
Most of the people that were eating at this place were either college kids or they looked like they were just out of high school. They seemed to stay to themselves and avoid sitting in the center of the room. Many of the groups of kids sat either at the bar watching the game or in a corner away from everyone else. When they were asked a question by the waitress they were polite but then quickly went back to their laughter and conversations. Every one sat in a group of four or more and they all seemed to be close friends.
Upon different times during the night people either hurried or staggered in looking for a sandwich. In many cases they stood by the bar waiting patiently for their food to be done. When it was completed the paid and hurried out the door and to their next destination. The people who just walked in kept to themselves and avoided eye contact or conversation with anyone else in the building.
The people at the bar seemed only interesting in the game and the people they were with. Most of them were under the drinking age so they just sat eating their food and sipping on their pops. Everyone seemed to have their own agenda and was there primarily there only to eat. The only time they talked was when they were asked questions either by their friends or the disgruntled waitress.
All in all it wasn’t a very family oriented restaurant instead it was based all around the food and any kind of sporting games that were on at the time. The people were nice only when they had to be and other times they just seemed to ignore that other people were even in the room. Almost everyone seemed like they were in a hurry and this was just a quick snack before they moved on to their next destination. The longest any one table stayed was a maximum of forty five minutes.
Suburban
Suburban
During my one hour stay at Pirmani Brothers I observed a lot of different things not only about the people but the establishment itself. The suburban setting I observed was located on University Boulevard. There weren’t any popular sport games on so it did not affect the atmosphere of how people interacted. It was sort of a slow day and we sat down around five o’clock.
The first person I interacted with was the waitress and she was nice and very helpful. While she was walking me to my table I noticed that the bar was set off to the side from the dining area. After receiving my drink I made more observations, many people sat at the bar but more than half were men. They all made polite conversation about upcoming football games and the scores of games past. The bar area was mostly centered around the televisions and primarily around drinking, very few people had food in front of them. The people that sat around the bar were not loud or rowdy and seemed to just be enjoying a few drinks after work. All in all it was peaceful in that area of the restaurant.
After my food was served I began to look around me at the other patrons of Pirmani’s and noticed that they were mainly families. There were very few tables taken at the time I visited but occupying the tables that were taken were primarily families or husbands and their wives. During my entire stay there was one disruption that was noticeable from across the restraint. There was a woman and a man fighting quietly at first but as the fight escalated so did the volume. At the climax of their fight the woman stormed out of the building with the man slowly following and proclaiming to everyone that we should not marry a divorce attorney. Once the couple left and the excitement vanished people went back to their food and continued their quiet conversations.
The environment in the restraint was built around people coming with family and friends and enjoying a home like atmosphere and the next biggest sports game. It was very comfortable and the service was fast and accurate, and all in all created a very appealing atmosphere to eat at and to visit. With every question I had or request I made I was treated politely and with a good attitude.
The setting that this restraint was in, created a very relaxed and comfortable place to eat and socialize. It was based around good food, sports, and family. The setting showed in the people that ate there. All were relaxed and caught up in either a baseball game or good conversation. Everyone was considerate, polite and stayed out of other people’s business. Suburban folk seem to view going out to eat as a chance to relax from the stresses of home and work. It was not just to grab a quick meal before hurrying off to complete another task it was used as more of an opportunity to ask their family members how their days were and if they had any eventful news. At this Pirmani’s it was all based around making people feel like guests and great classic Pittsburgh sandwiches.
During my one hour stay at Pirmani Brothers I observed a lot of different things not only about the people but the establishment itself. The suburban setting I observed was located on University Boulevard. There weren’t any popular sport games on so it did not affect the atmosphere of how people interacted. It was sort of a slow day and we sat down around five o’clock.
The first person I interacted with was the waitress and she was nice and very helpful. While she was walking me to my table I noticed that the bar was set off to the side from the dining area. After receiving my drink I made more observations, many people sat at the bar but more than half were men. They all made polite conversation about upcoming football games and the scores of games past. The bar area was mostly centered around the televisions and primarily around drinking, very few people had food in front of them. The people that sat around the bar were not loud or rowdy and seemed to just be enjoying a few drinks after work. All in all it was peaceful in that area of the restaurant.
After my food was served I began to look around me at the other patrons of Pirmani’s and noticed that they were mainly families. There were very few tables taken at the time I visited but occupying the tables that were taken were primarily families or husbands and their wives. During my entire stay there was one disruption that was noticeable from across the restraint. There was a woman and a man fighting quietly at first but as the fight escalated so did the volume. At the climax of their fight the woman stormed out of the building with the man slowly following and proclaiming to everyone that we should not marry a divorce attorney. Once the couple left and the excitement vanished people went back to their food and continued their quiet conversations.
The environment in the restraint was built around people coming with family and friends and enjoying a home like atmosphere and the next biggest sports game. It was very comfortable and the service was fast and accurate, and all in all created a very appealing atmosphere to eat at and to visit. With every question I had or request I made I was treated politely and with a good attitude.
The setting that this restraint was in, created a very relaxed and comfortable place to eat and socialize. It was based around good food, sports, and family. The setting showed in the people that ate there. All were relaxed and caught up in either a baseball game or good conversation. Everyone was considerate, polite and stayed out of other people’s business. Suburban folk seem to view going out to eat as a chance to relax from the stresses of home and work. It was not just to grab a quick meal before hurrying off to complete another task it was used as more of an opportunity to ask their family members how their days were and if they had any eventful news. At this Pirmani’s it was all based around making people feel like guests and great classic Pittsburgh sandwiches.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Mute in an English only world
In many large cities now a days there are specific areas where many Italians or other walks of people create a community similar to the one back home. This may create frustration for those who originally lived in the city before these small communities started. Many think it is unfair, saying that this is our country and they should learn our language and our customs. IT can be scary for people new to our country seeing all of the English signs and hear only English on the streets. I couldn’t imagine walking into a busy place barely being able to speak English and having my children there by my side and being humiliated because I couldn’t order properly. “the butcher looked as if my mother had put something sour in his mouth and he glanced back at the lighted board and called the next number”(Lee p339). To feel so humiliated would be terrible. I probably wouldn’t be able to work up the nerve to go back in there ever again. This happens to many “outsiders” who are new to our very difficult language. But why is it only their responsibility to learn our language if we don’t even try to recognize theirs? It’s not fair why can’t we just meet half way? After all the United States was once referred to as the melting pot of cultures. So why can’t we show that kind of acceptance now? Who knows it may better our understanding of different countries and in the end make us stronger and a better country to live in.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Whither the Southern Accent
In school and formal places the southern accent has been said to be disappearing. Many feel it is just that people want to minimize the use of it. Some people find it to be “slow and dimwitted”(Collins and Wyatt p335) but the way people talk or have and accent is no indication of their intelligence. The southern accent seems to be dwindling because of the outside influence other cities. Now when you go into town you hear a variety of accents and drawls and people pick up on them and in many cases adopt that way of speech. Kretzshmar said, “The southern accent isn’t going anywhere. But you have all kinds of mixtures and changes”. (Kretzshmar p 334) In many cases you do not have to be originally from the south to pick up on the accent. Many times just being around it every day causes you to pick up on the subtle changes. I personally feel that the southern accent isn’t disappearing it just isn’t being used outside of the family. When I was down south for only two weeks I started to notice how I began to have that subtle drawl and by the time I was back home up north people questioned how long I was down there for. The way that some southern people may be considered wrong and improper up here in the north but down in the south it is accepted and used often in common every day conversations. Many people thing that it isn’t losing the accent as much as adapting to what is thought to be a more professional way of communication. For the most part the south will always be easy to pick out of a conversation and it just goes to show that the drawl and other accents like it are alive and well.
Sunday, September 6, 2009
I Think Therefore IM
Texting has become such a large part of everyday life for not only kids but for adults as well that it is affecting the way we write and comprehend what is being written. Many times I have found myself using short hand in papers. The most common error I make is using 'u' instead of 'you'. This is only a problem because of the amount of time kids spend using either cell phones or computers. Most of the time these errors are not caught because we have gotten used to seeing and using the short hand. "You are so used to abbreviating things, you just start doing it unconsciously on schoolwork and reports and other things"(Lee 347). This is a prime example on how kids dependency on electronic ways of communication are effecting the way they use proper English. Some teachers see this way of writing as part of the evolution of our language.(Lee 349) In some classes students are encouraged by their teachers to use short hand as a spring board to get ideas for their first drafts.(Lee 349) Although this may help students with brain storming due to the fact they can use short hand like they do in everyday life, it also promotes to a certain extent that it is okay to use this lazy way of writing. The English language is one that doesn’t have set rules and is always changing. Some people believe that the era of texting short hand is just another faze in our languages vast history, but maybe in a way we are resorting back to a simpler time when we didn’t communicate to our best ability and many things were lost in translation. This particular writing brings up the question of what side you are on. Either you believe that texting short hand is deteriorating the fabric of our language, or you thing that it is bettering the way we communicate with each other. I firmly believe that no exceptions should be made for people that use texting short hand on term papers. It shows laziness, a lack of effort or, it shows that the person did not proof read.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)